This book presents an in-depth discussion on two concepts from the field of philosophy and law, in order to improve our understanding of the relation between ¿fact¿ and ¿evidence¿ in judicial process. Since fact-finding is a difficult task for judges, proof by evidence has been devised to help them access the truth. However, in the process of judicial fact-finding, there is always a gap between fact and truth. This book covers a wide range of topics, from reflections on the concept of ¿fact,¿ ¿evidence¿ and ¿fact-finding¿ in the field of philosophy and law to individual case studies. As such it is a useful reference resource on