»Jurisdiction Agreements in International Litigation. Requirements for the Effectiveness and Effects of Choice-of-Court Agreements within the Scope of Application of the Hague Choice of Court Convention and the Brussels Ibis Regulation«: Andreas Hermann conducts an in-depth systematic comparison of the 2005 Hague Convention and the Brussels Ibis Regulation. Similarities and differences between both legal instruments are first identified on a micro level and then thoroughly analyzed on a macro level. International choice of court agreements are thus subjected to a practical test against the background of their »enforceability« and legal practitioners are provided with guidance for secure legal drafting.